It seems that Burger Quest has been a hit, at least among my circle of friends. I've gotten several requests to participate, but most people seem to just want to go to Christian's or Annie's in light of my positive reviews. KK, a coworker, decided to be more adventuresome -- he wanted to be a part of Burger Quest history by going to a new place instead.
After a 2 week hiatus in new Burger Quests, KK and I traveled to Lucky Burger on Richmond for lunch on Friday May 7 -- my first of 3 new Burger Quests in a 24 hour period. Lucky Burger is 35 years old and has been reviewed very positively on city-data forums and their website (http://www.luckyburger.com/index.php) lists accolades such as being named City Search's best hamburger in 2007. The building itself would be pretty hard to pass up, though I'm not sure why a barrel was used for a burger restaurant:
Before I go forward with the negatives, let's talk about the positives. The lunch special was $7.64, and it included a double hamburger with french fries and a drink. If nothing else, the prices are a steal for aspiring burger questers. KK and I were in a hurry to get back to work, and Lucky Burger did not fail us in that regard...the hamburgers were out in about 5 minutes. The french fries were outstanding, even for a discriminating french fry connoisseur, and the Small size provided plenty of fries to accompany a burger.
Unfortunately, that's about all I can say for the positives of Lucky Burger. The burger itself, like Mytiburger, tasted much like What-a-Burger, only slightly better. The patties were 1/4 pound patties, but they were somewhat chewy and had that What-a-burger flavor we all know here in Texas.
I think the best thing I can say about Lucky Burger's burger is that it wasn't really memorable at all. If you ask me what it tasted like in a week, I don't think I could really tell you -- it really wasn't that good or bad. I would go there again if I were in the neighborhood and hungry, but I don't see any future Lucky Burger cravings sneaking up on me.
Final rating -- 5.
(For the record, KK also gave it a 5)
Saturday, May 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment